Cell Biology International _is_ a mainstream peer-reviewed journal.
The topic article of this thread (Evolution's Thermodynamic Failure by Granville Sewell) was not published in Cell Biology International.
I'm not sure what was published in Cell Biology, but the topic article in this thread was published in a textbook by Wiley.
So what was the original point being made by the person who asked about whether or not this piece had been peer-reviewed? And are you willing to concede the point given that this piece has been published by a very prestigious science publisher? Or are you just going to blacklist and slander Wiley now?
If past can be said to be prologue, then one would have to assume the latter, no?
Then I already answered your question. Why are you asking it again?