Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan(9698)
How can science advance if nobody presents anything new.

New things are being presented all the time. A lot of it is evolutionary stuff.

How is it teaching "Creationism" or "Religeon" to point out that there is additional information that should be considered?

This question doesn't make sense, Dan.

256 posted on 12/28/2005 7:33:24 PM PST by phantomworker (I trust my intuition and speak my truth... Don't accuse me of your imagination!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]


To: phantomworker

The question has to do with the great debate that wound up in the court trial.

If Darwin's theory is taught as dogma, as it in many classes, it must be a violation of the "Faith Based" taching of Darwinism to point out that there is other contrasting information and that Darwin's Theory isn't the complete universe regarding "The Origin of The Species" since Darwin doesn't even pretend to explain the origin of the species in his book of that name.

The only way someone would object to a statement that there are other theories, is if they are so dogmatic that it is their "Religeon" and any questioning of the dogma should be treated like Copericus was when he talked about the earth going around the sun.


262 posted on 12/28/2005 7:44:38 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson