New things are being presented all the time. A lot of it is evolutionary stuff.
How is it teaching "Creationism" or "Religeon" to point out that there is additional information that should be considered?
This question doesn't make sense, Dan.
The question has to do with the great debate that wound up in the court trial.
If Darwin's theory is taught as dogma, as it in many classes, it must be a violation of the "Faith Based" taching of Darwinism to point out that there is other contrasting information and that Darwin's Theory isn't the complete universe regarding "The Origin of The Species" since Darwin doesn't even pretend to explain the origin of the species in his book of that name.
The only way someone would object to a statement that there are other theories, is if they are so dogmatic that it is their "Religeon" and any questioning of the dogma should be treated like Copericus was when he talked about the earth going around the sun.