That is well said.
Now to return to the argument of Intelligent Design.
I read the book "Darwin's Black Box" and believe that there are valid observations in it.
When I was in High School, the parts of a cell were, the cell wall, the nucleaus, and protoplasm.
It is obvious that there has been a lot learned since Darwin's time and my time in High School. That there are other observations on what is in a cell and how they work is not an attack on previous theory, except as it is taught as dogma.
It only expands the universe of study to have other explanations and theories both right and wrong. How can science advance if nobody presents anything new.
How is it teaching "Creationism" or "Religeon" to point out that there is additional information that should be considered?