There are many studies of Trilabites, fossils of snail-like creatures. They didn't have any sigificant changes for millions of years and then just dissappeared from the fossil record.
There are many many other like examples.
Darwinists make a leap of faith to cover the changes from one species to another. The fossil record does not show any evidence to cover the "missing links".
My objection is how they handle the evidence.
They do it with a leap of faith that it will be proven someday.
It is like a "chain of custody" as required in legal cases.
They can't get to there from here. The chain is broken so the evidence does not support their argument.
Dan, there's no faith involved at all. Evolution is clear-cut if you just follow the chain. You know it's hard to keep perfect records of everything.
Just because a fossil disappears or a species becomes exinct doesn't disprove evolution, it actually supports it. I am sure you can always find the reason for extinction. That is survival of the fittest.