[Logophile]

Oh, and by the way; science has progressed for some 150 years since Darwin. Few discoveries, here and there; maybe 98% of the fossil record, DNA, a little geology here and there, maybe a stray find or two in biology, etc. . . . . And you know, old Darwin was right all along. Pretty smart guy, eh?

Smart, yes; and he may very well have been "right all along." But I was not aware that Darwin predicted DNA. Did Crick and Watson credit Darwin in their work on DNA?

[Coyoteman]

Reread my post. I mentioned that "science has progressed for some 150 years since Darwin" and gave some examples. DNA was one of them.

So, let me restate:

And you know, old Darwin's theory was right all along. Pretty smart guy, eh?

Better?

[Liberty Wins]

"Did Crick and Watson credit Darwin in their work on DNA?"

Neither did they give proper credit to Rosalind Franklin after stealing her early work on DNA . . .