They'd find out you're a liar. Just in the last 20 posts, I've been engaged in a discussion of speciation and the fossil record and the original intent of the 14th amendment; and I've countered some false creationist claims about the Big Bang.
I am strongly considering reporting you to your Dean. If your behaviour towards your students is in any way comparable to your behaviour on this board, the only place you belong in a classroom is in the corner with a black conical hat on your head.
LOL! Yep, go tell my Dean, a biologist, that I'm actively defending evolution on a conservative forum from false and misleading attacks by creationists like yourself. He'll be furious.
Not only are your posts just borderline pathological, but you have demonstrated that you are not even conversant with the various topics I have engaged you on.
Oh yeah, I'm not conversant with thermodynamics. It's just amazing I've been able to snow everyone on that. Must be the quarter century of researching, publishing and teaching in the field; or maybe the fact I've been the thermodynamics reviewer for the last few editions of the largest selling physical chemistry text in the country?
Well good for you. I knew it was possible. It's good to see you've graduated beyond calling people "jerks" and "blowhards" .
LOL! Yep, go tell my Dean, a biologist, that I'm actively defending evolution on a conservative forum from false and misleading attacks by creationists like yourself. He'll be furious.
If he discovers that your idea of "defending" includes insulting everyone in sight who disagrees with you without provocation, trying to bully them with spray-on ridicule, and belittling every criticism without support, then I think he might reconsider. Or is that how you approach "education" in your department? What do you do when a student honestly asks you about a problem in evolutionary theory? Do you make him strip down to his underwear in front of the class and say "I'm a creationist freak" in front of everyone? I wouldn't be surprised. If your Dean is a Darwinist Dogmatic like you then I suspect he would approve of this.
Oh yeah, I'm not conversant with thermodynamics. It's just amazing I've been able to snow everyone on that.
The only "snowing" I saw was a link to a so-called "refutation" by Mark Perakh which was more of a tantrum. This qualfies as "science" in your department I suppose. Actually, I wasn't referring to thermodynamics, since I've never actually debated that with you.
But of course, you don't remember. I guess when you treat other people as animals you wouldn't really remember them. Just ask the Nazis or Communists. At least you're being consistent with your beliefs (treaing people like animals, that is.)
Perhaps you could post a link to a non-insulting, non-vitriolic, non-juvenile, scientific posting you have done on this topic. I would be interested to see what the best arguments on your side are. You do have arguments?
For the record, our last interchange was on the topic of Dr. Alvin Plantinga's "Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism" wherein he demonstrated that if evolution is true, there is no scientific basis for believing we can trust our faculties that tell us that evolution is true. This is a very brief summary. Dr. Plantinga is a massively respected philosopher. You couldn't even get your head around the topic, apparently, and dismissed it, and all other epistemology, as nonsense or something. Deep. I've actually noticed that the evolutionists on this board appear to be almost completely illiterate when it comes to philosophy, which is sort of surprising. But not really I suppose.