[Timmy]

Look. I was trying to explain it in a way it is being used in this debate. Of course, the 2nd Law is talking about energy in a system, that it tends to dissipate from any central location and spread around the system. I WAS NOT making any argument at all. However, the fact that systems tend to disorder is one evolutionists have got to deal with, and simply insinuating that those who raise the question are imbeciles (and I'm not necessarily talking about you) isn't a legitimate way to go about it. Unfortunately, it is the most common response, as it is to most complex arguments raised.

[b_sharp]

"Look. I was trying to explain it in a way it is being used in this debate. Of course, the 2nd Law is talking about energy in a system, that it tends to dissipate from any central location and spread around the system. I WAS NOT making any argument at all. However, the fact that systems tend to disorder is one evolutionists have got to deal with, and simply insinuating that those who raise the question are imbeciles (and I'm not necessarily talking about you) isn't a legitimate way to go about it. Unfortunately, it is the most common response, as it is to most complex arguments raised.

Don't worry, I wasn't attacking you, I was simply using your post as an opportunity to supply a little information to the lurking masses.

I don't consider those with incorrect or insufficient information to be imbeciles and I disagree with those that do. Most evos here are just tired of hearing the same arguments from people who should know better (people who have asked and been informed about the same questions multiple times before). For the vast majority of us it takes a long time to reach that point of frustration, yet some reached that point years ago. This just shows how long this debate has been going on and how 'resilient' some questions can be.

Personally I like the complex questions.