No, the probability is 1.000, since anything less is to deny the reality that surrounds us, we are here and what is, is! The argument is whether the reality is the result of random actions or intervention by being or beings unknown. A third possibility being non interventionist IE: we are living and growing in a universe in which the rules were established at t=0 and in which the "builders" have lost interest and no longer interact with this physical reality. God was playing in the sandbox and was called in from recess, as it were, leaving us as a work in progress.
Regards,
GtG
The probability is 1.0 IF you don't rule out things, such as intelligent design. Your proposition is, as I assume you know, a tautology.
No, I have no trouble with the world being complex. I just find it impossible to explain by Darwin's rules.
Of course! Astronomical probability => 1
A third possibility being non interventionist IE: we are living and growing in a universe in which the rules were established at t=0
Not sure whether this is actually a third possibility though. It is more a subset of random actions. Very interesting explanation, however!
God may not be perceived as active in your life, but He is certainly active in mine.
Most scientists believe in an interactive God.
The evidence is against your point.