1 posted on
12/28/2005 2:23:07 PM PST by
Paul Ross
To: Paul Ross
Well, I guess it's a start.
20,000 more "companies" to go.
2 posted on
12/28/2005 2:31:21 PM PST by
Paul Ross
(My idea of American policy toward the Soviet Union is simple...It is this, 'We win and they lose.')
To: Paul Ross
Well if China opposes the sanctions then it can only mean the companies are guilty as sin.
To: Paul Ross
Should be interesting to see who backs down.
4 posted on
12/28/2005 2:32:34 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: Paul Ross
We strongly demand that U.S. government repeal all the sanctions against NORINCO, eliminate the negative influence caused by sanctions in a timely fashion and turn the trade and economic ties between two sides back on track and move forward, the company statement said.
Or what?
5 posted on
12/28/2005 2:34:13 PM PST by
CAWats
(And I will make no distinction between the terrorists and the democrats.)
To: Paul Ross
Weapons proliferation was a sensitive issue in US-China relations but in recent years tensions appear to have eased as the two countries trade increases and they step up cooperation in other areas, including convincing North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons program.
Too much carrot, not enough stick. The consequence of a nuclear armed North Korea should be a nuclear armed Japan, and we should not stand in their way. If China does not want Japan with nukes she better handle North Korea.
10 posted on
12/28/2005 3:01:17 PM PST by
fallujah-nuker
(America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
To: Paul Ross
China has never cared about Weapons proliferation, they only care about getting paid.
Iran is no bother to them, and no concern (unless their checks bounce).
Its a very reckless attitude and ignores reality in the favor of greed.
Then china wonders why Japan and India want to beef up their own defences.
11 posted on
12/28/2005 3:02:07 PM PST by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: Paul Ross
"China reacted angrily on Dec. 28 to the United States imposing sanctions on six Chinese companies for allegedly supplying Iran with military equipment and technology, demanding the trade bans be lifted."
If China feels this way they should impose counter-sanctions. They have this immense economic leverage. Let's see them use it.
14 posted on
12/28/2005 3:13:41 PM PST by
strategofr
(When the State Department is working for the enemy, it is hard to forge effective foreign policy.)
To: Paul Ross
"The U.S. move was not beneficial to the two countries cooperation in the non-proliferation field, the ministry warned."
Stop arming the Islamic regime, you commie dorks. That is what non-proliferation means.
22 posted on
12/29/2005 7:06:36 PM PST by
sagar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson