Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: YOUGOTIT
"What we have today is not really Jefferson's wall, but Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black's wall"

Absolutely correct. Jefferson's letter to Danbury talks only of a seperation of Church and State, a reference to the first amendments prohibitions on establishing a State church, as the Brittish had done with the Church of England. Hugo Black took this phrase and reinterpeted it to mean a seperation of religion or faith and State. This was never contemplated by those who ratified the first amendment and completely different from what Jefferson was refering to in his letter.

40 posted on 01/10/2006 8:06:01 AM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: joebuck
It does not really matter what Jefferson said in his 1802 letter to the Baptists, because Justice Hugo Black did not obtain any legal principles or rules from Jefferson. Justice Black was simply stuck with the label that the Reynolds Court had affixed, in 1878, to the Madison Doctrine of Separation.

Read the opinion. The legal principles all come from the works of James Madison.
48 posted on 01/10/2006 9:19:46 AM PST by FredFlash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: joebuck
Please show me where Justice Hugo Black said the First Amendment meant a "separation of religion or faith and State."

Black made it clear that "a wall of separation between Church and State" was just another way of saying the following:

The Government cannot set up a church.

The Government cannot aid one religion, aid all religions or prefer one religion over another.

The Government cannot use force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion.

The Government cannot punish anyone for entertaining or professing religious beliefs or disbeliefs, for church attendance or nonattendance.

The Government cannot tax an individual to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever from they may adopt to teach or practice religion.

The Government cannot participate in the affairs of any religious organizations or groups and vice versa.

Justice Hugo Black never even said the First Amendment meant a "separation of religion or faith and State." Your statement is nothing but a useless misinterpretation of his alleged misinterpretation.
49 posted on 01/10/2006 9:41:05 AM PST by FredFlash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: joebuck

What did Jefferson mean when he said he revered the religion clauses because, "the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions?"


82 posted on 01/18/2006 1:54:44 PM PST by FredFlash (The legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson