[Final Authority]

I replied to your reply without considering that you never got past the banning part of the post. If you read the entire post you would have understood my support of public gun ownership, but apparently, my first sentence threw you for a loop in the thought process. If you did not get it, I attempted to simplify the concept of taking a question or a problem to the extremes of possibilities, then considering whether or not the construct is desirable. If it isn't reasonable, then, reasonable people must consider a reasoned approach.

[Beagle8U]

Bombs, grenades, etc., have been banned for many years, so that kind of thinking shouldn't be an issue in the debate of gun control. Its just a silly straw man.

In my opinion on guns...

Everyone, every man,woman,and child over the age of 14 should be required to own and carry guns at all times.
We have plenty of laws on the books now, that is the only one I can think of adding that would be meaningful in fighting crime.

We don't even need laws requiring training classes.
Classes are available now, the Darwin award types too stupid to learn would shoot themselves saving everyone time and money without need for anymore laws.