Replies

Its hard to believe this was printed in the Washington Times. This is a New York Times type attack.

The eavesdropping should continue until we have won this war against the fanatics.

My concern is that the eavesdropping is not being limited to persons under suspicion.

I'm not too comfortable with my right to privacy being infringed in the name of capturing a terrorist.

I realize if I were shooting out lots of emails or phone calls with certain tag lines such as, bomb, it might flag NSA computer systems, but it kinda sounds like it's gone further than that.

Has there been any talk that these warrentless searches have been confined to muslims, persons here on visas, illegals, persons with criminal backgrounds, persons that have had recent contacts with questionable organizations?

I have read several articles about this "secret" snooping, but I have not seen anything that would lead me to believe it has been limited in scope. Everything I've read indicates the scope of the eavesdropping has been broad.

Its hard to believe this was printed in the Washington Times. This is a New York Times type attack

This is actually one side of a commentary in a point-counterpoint piece. The front end was written by Michael Barrone. Within . . .(NSA Spying). Mr. Fein makes a fine foil.