Posted on 12/27/2005 12:53:13 PM PST by RWR8189
If you collect information and try to share it Jamie McGorlick's wall stops them.
PC Liberal agendas at their finest!
I did hear that on FNC and this whole thing has gotten me thinking a few things that sound terribly conspiratorial, but I think if anyone with true investigative skills would look into, we would find to be true.
For instance, Clinton's accepting so much Saudi money for his library. Clinton ignoring the Iraqi Republican Guard who was John Doe #3 in the Oklahoma City bombing. (I know that sounds nuts, but read Jayna Davis's Third Terrorist book which has convinced even some liberals in my neighborhood that an Iraqi Republican Guard help Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols). Clinton virtually ignoring the first WTC bombing in '93 and ensuring that the case was heard in civil vs. federal court.
There's more that freepers could add. Clinton not taking OBL when offered by Sadan. Clinton ignoring the threat posed by Iarq, despite being given evidence that OBL was developing a relationship with Saddam. (The MSM wrote dozens of articles in the 90's about the world's alarm at the growing relationship between Saddam and OBL, so Clinton had to know).
It makes sense that Clinton was all too happy to let Lamberth stay on that court, knowing he would deny a lot of warrants about AQ terrorists residing in this country.
We know Clinton took campaign money from the Chinese in exchange for technology. How do we know he didn't take other funny money from the extremists?
There is an emerging picture here and some enterprising journalist will pull all the lose threads together. Maybe Steven Hayes at The Weekly Standard.
What do you remember about Judge Lambert? Didn't he used to order the Clinton's to produce various documents and they pretty much ignored him and he never followed up?
Read #34 and tell me what you think, if you're interested in how Lambert may play into the entire FISA court/NSA spying matter.
Can you get this to Rep. Weldon? It look like the 9/11 Commission missed something else relatively important.
Read entire post in #34 and this:
“For the 9-11 investigation to have integrity, Congress must have the courage to aggressively pursue these facts and leads, and be sure not to prematurely close the door to any hypothesis - no matter how "unthinkable." 9-11 was also unthinkable -- before it happened.”
Do you know anything about Judge Lamberth that may not be common knowledge and may tie into the post in #34?
URGENT!
See post #34
Please check out post #34 ... it's the first I've heard of it and to be honest .. it made my heart stop
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=18755
Judge Lamberth has been at the forefront of so many strong rulings concerning illegality by the Clintons and Al Gore -- from the Hillary Clinton Healthcare Task Force to Chinagate and Filegate-related cases -- not because these proceedings were secretly assigned to him as improperly occurred with some Clinton-appointed judges in the Chinagate scandal. Indeed, because of the sheer number of Clinton-Gore scandals, it is no wonder that several of these cases were randomly assigned to him. With few exceptions, only Judge Lamberth has had the courage and guts to make rulings that redress their lawlessness. Certainly, other jurists, both Democrat- and Republican-appointed, have had cases assigned to them as well, but most have cowered from their duty and let the guilty off the hook. Why is this?
I wonder if the FISA court realized that America was attacked, right here on our own soil, that the President NEEDED info and fast.. God help us from insane biased agenda driven idiot judges. And God Bless the President for having the courage and sense of duty to do the right thing and protect Americans, despite the continual handcuffing from the enemy within.
When was this Martin Dillion article written?
bttt
I have no idea .. but I did find this article written by Martin Dillon
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12419168&method=full&siteid=50143
2 December 2002
ROBERT MAXWELL WAS A MOSSAD SPY
New claim on tycoon's mystery death
By Gordon Thomas And Martin Dillon
Truth and Justice
Government agents who mislead federal judges are the real threat to civil liberties.
BY BRENDAN MINITER
Monday, August 26, 2002 12:01 a.m. EDT
Attorney General John Ashcroft is in Democratic crosshairs again. This time Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Maxine Waters were accusing him of undermining American civil liberties. And this was news!
Ostensibly, the reason for the attack was a ruling by a secret court saying the Justice Department was going too far in investigating and prosecuting potential terrorists. But the real news here is that America is finally getting an open airing of heretofore secret federal proceedings that are supposed to draw the line between run-of-the-mill criminal investigations and those investigations aimed at uncovering terrorists and spies.
So far it looks like the government is doing a better job of protecting civil liberties than it did before Sept. 11.
The problem the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court found was in the Justice Department's interpretation of the USA Patriot Act. Mr. Ashcroft's team says that act allows them to lower the wall between criminal investigations and intelligence/espionage/terrorist investigations. The court says using information gathered in an intelligence investigation is a serious erosion of civil liberties, which was not contemplated by the Patriot Act.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/bminiter/?id=110002181
The more I read about the FISA court, the more I realize they are damaging not only the war on terror, but any investigation in which it would be helpful for intelligence agencies to talk with each other.
Peach maybe you can remember didn't this court halt the search of one of the terrorists computers, we had him in custody. I think this was before 911.
He wrote it 7/6/02.
Arizona Carolyn found it and put it on the thread; I think she read it on Drudge?
Link to the 7/02 article:
http://www.gordonthomas.ie/122.html
Yes. The FISA court halted the search of Massouie's (sp?) computer, which may have halted 9/11 if the search had been allowed to continue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.