Replies

Arguments on both sides of the issue.

1 posted on 12/27/2005 12:29:55 PM PST by Cboldt

To: Cboldt

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/27/opinion/27casey.html
Unwarranted Complaints

By DAVID B. RIVKIN and LEE A. CASEY
Published: December 27, 2005
Washington

More Rivkin

2 posted on 12/27/2005 12:47:27 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)

To: Cboldt

The important thing is how does this all apply under Sharia law. /sarcasm off

Another thing to consider is it's application under Scottish Law. /crazy Senator sarcasm off

3 posted on 12/27/2005 12:56:33 PM PST by isthisnickcool (America!)

To: Cboldt

You have no "reasonable expectation of privacy" if you are talking on the phone to terrorist enemies of the United States. End of story.

4 posted on 12/27/2005 1:00:51 PM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)

To: Cboldt

Levy's position seems to be that under the AUMF we can kill al Qaeda, but we can't listen to their phone calls.

5 posted on 12/27/2005 3:21:41 PM PST by Buckhead

FedSoc promised, "rebuttals will be posted later." The rebuttals were posted, and translated to HTML for your reading pleasure.

7 posted on 01/23/2006 8:43:43 AM PST by Cboldt

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794