Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
Franky, I think that question is pointless in the substantive argument.

Ah, HUH? The POINT is that nobody can name any rights they're lost.

It appears that most of the people objecting to the act think "unreasonable" should be replaced with "ANY."

Sorry. I want my government hunting terrorists.

472 posted on 12/28/2005 10:30:03 AM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin
Ah, HUH? The POINT is that nobody can name any rights they're lost.

Nor could they in any of the hypotheticals I named, yet most would object to such intrusion.

But, if your objective is to "score points," by all means, you are the winnah.

473 posted on 12/28/2005 10:32:38 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson