To: ndt
If there is no way to know whether it was legal or illegal without knowing specifics aren't we to assume it was legal first? Wouldn't the other way be the presumption of guilt before innocents?
416 posted on
12/27/2005 8:56:44 PM PST by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: Wasanother
If there is no way to know whether it was legal or illegal without knowing specifics aren't we to assume it was legal first? Wouldn't the other way be the presumption of guilt before innocents?
And THAT would be a violation of our civil rights, but that does not seem to matter.
419 posted on
12/27/2005 9:05:26 PM PST by
amutr22
(....not ANOTHER clinton!)
To: Wasanother
"If there is no way to know whether it was legal or illegal without knowing specifics aren't we to assume it was legal first? Wouldn't the other way be the presumption of guilt before innocents?"
Are you saying you have never heard of the need for a warrant?
421 posted on
12/27/2005 9:06:20 PM PST by
ndt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson