Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wasanother
"You are right, I have asked at least 4 times on this thread for someone to provide case law for the argument that the President,"broke the law""

Sorry about that, I had so many threads going a the same time I finally just said hell with it and went to dinner :)

As for case law, the 4th amendment is the basis of all following case law regarding the subject. Therefore the question is what case law allows the president to violate the 4th?

I'll give you a hint, I've gone through the cases cited by the AG and his case is weak. I'll be happy to address any part of his apology, but be specific, I'm not going to write a 20 page rebuttal.
406 posted on 12/27/2005 8:39:45 PM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies ]


To: ndt

So, if you are correct, why is it not being presented by anyone that this clearly was illegal?


408 posted on 12/27/2005 8:42:20 PM PST by amutr22 (....not ANOTHER clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

To: ndt
I'm not asking for your rebuttal, just case law rebuttal to any part of the AG's case law claims.
410 posted on 12/27/2005 8:45:40 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson