You keep making the totally unsupported statement, that what President Bush did was illegal.
IT WAS NOT. He has the executive power and the authority to exactly what he did and more.
There have been articles posted with legal opinions, including the AAG's letter with specific cases mentioned, etc.
I was just following the lead of the other poster, who seemed to be suggesting that FISA was inadequate, and thereby implying that the President felt the need to disregard it. Was he giving a false impression?