Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pragmatic_View
A post from Amish Dude who did the statistics on the case modified.

Suppose there were two rogue judges on this court. Judges who would reject every wiretap. Every time a 3-judge panel was formed, those judges would vote to at least modify the request. Furthermore, suppose that approximately half of the 5645 requests since 2001 were in the 2003-4 era. So, suppose there were 3000 requests in the high-rejection era (early part of 2001 would be slow).

If we chose a panel at random, the probability that you would get one of these rogue judges is 0.0545.

Multiply this by 3000 and you get 164 -- very close to the number of rejections in this era.

I am conjecturing that nearly all the modifications and rejections resulted from the same two judges being on the panel

God I love this place.

200 posted on 12/27/2005 1:21:17 PM PST by mware (everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: mware
My numbers were right but my explanation was off: If we chose a panel at random, the probability that you would get one both of these rogue judges is 0.0545.
206 posted on 12/27/2005 1:30:44 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson