Posted on 12/27/2005 7:53:53 AM PST by Hildy
ping
Nice try Steve, back to the drawing board.
Daoud told Reuters by telephone from the Syrian capital, Damascus.
One can only imagine the number of rats we could catch
if we took Damascus.
I wouldn't go that far but the film, MUNICH, certainly deserves ridicule and rejection.
I was reading earlier that Spielberg is said to have been afraid to appear having made a film that didn't support Israel and so tried to cover all perspectives to a point of irrelevant relativism BUT what that "fear" indicates to me is that he was aware he was, in fact, making a film that didn't support Israel and was trying to still maintain popularity despite it.
Like saying, "I'm not REALLY doing (whatever objectionable/wrong)" while continuing to be observed doing it.
I see, so Mohammed didn't target Israeli civilians because there's no such thing as Israeli civilians. Why the hell is this goathumper still breathing?
Ha, Spielberg's been advised by a former Clinton White House staffer on this film...among other liberal, political advisors.
Look what they have wrought.
Fox aired a recorded interview with him this morning. He was backpedaling rather briskly and not being very convincing.
How appropriate the movie is titled "Munich," a name synonomous with appeasement.
I don't know, but that should be fixed.
Is this stupid little rant by Daoud supposed to make people pretend that Spielberg has not created a pali-propoganda hit peice against Israel?
Like other liberals, Spielberg made the mistake of thinking that these murderous bastards are just misunderstood.
That is what EVERY Palestinian believes. Since a two-year-old might eventually grow up and might possibly join the Israeli military, the two-year-old is not a civilian.
agreed, but his moral equivocating harms all civilized peoples
I saw the movie on Sunday - or at least the first two hours. It was upsetting to me that Spielberg put so much effort in portraying the Palestinians as nice, cultured people that just do what the Jews did too? At least he was not hostile to Jews - the way he was more than willing to justify the Palestinians. When you are in a surviving mode you should not try to justify your enemies motives - if you do you will not survive. Every time people like Spielberg (who mean well) offer a hand they lose their teeth. They take whatever offering of peace Jews offer and it only wet their appetites as it proves their strategy of terror works. In that part of the world they respect only a strong hand - the peace offerings is a sign of the weakness.
good question
maybe we could get a group rate on him and that muzzie who killed Petty Officer Robert Stethem the Germans just released
Hildy I'm shocked. Don't you know Spewburg is just asking Jews all over the world to give suicide bombers a hug? It'll make the arab "final solution" that much easier for them to accomplish! And Stevie, well he'll be living large in his gated multi-million dollar house with armed guards to protect his family!
I can't take credit for the movie title, as it was from the comedian "Zak" on the HBO special Comedians of Comedy. IMHO, it fits the possible NEXT Spielberg film:
"Schindler's List 2: Let's Get This Party Started"......
From the "tone" of the Pali terrorists comments on "Munich", "Schindler's List 2: Let's Get This Party Started" STILL might not go "far enough" to suit him....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.