Why do you ask me why I think the author is a moonbat when I posted the sentence that I think shows the author to be a moonbat right above my assertion? How much clearer do I have to be? Obviously the author is implying that we invaded Iraq, knowing full well that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, because what we were really concerned about was that Iraq was going to switch their oil economy from dollars to Euros. That is an ignorant, paranoid, moonbat position, as far as I am concerned and about as obvious as the nose on your face, but apparently it went straight over your head. Why do you think we went into Iraq? To protect the dollar?
What happens to the dollar when the oil providers will no longer accept it for oil?