Skip to comments.
WHAT'S THE FED UP TO WITH THE MONEY SUPPLY?(Chart didn't copy over)
Financial Sense Online ^
| 26 December 2005
| Robert McHugh
Posted on 12/27/2005 6:20:46 AM PST by hubbubhubbub
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: jsmith48
Regulation was applied as a muzzle on unethical business practices in large measure. if companies could act in an ethical manner, much of what you call "regulation" wouldn't exist. You're like a criminal complaining your behavior would be better if you could have a color tv in your cell..
41
posted on
12/27/2005 8:00:09 AM PST
by
Havoc
(President George and King George.. coincidence?)
To: Ninian Dryhope
If you go to the author's website, here is what you see:
To subscribe now and take advantage of our Christmas Special, 39 percent discounted annual subscription rate of $179, click on the Subscribe/Renew Today! button.
This guy is nuts. Like many others who publish crap like "Ten Stocks That Will Soar in 2006" and "How To Avoid The Coming Crash" and crap like that, he is out--and they are out--to bilk the gullible.
42
posted on
12/27/2005 8:00:13 AM PST
by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: Thomas Jefferson II
Bernanke is the guy who said, ... "that we can fight deflation with the printing press. We can drop $100.00 bills out of helicopters."Actually, Bernanke was quoting Milton Friedman. So, I'm curious, how would you fight deflation?
43
posted on
12/27/2005 8:00:24 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
To: LS
Accompanying Chart:
To: Havoc
Businessmen are criminals? Oh well, who is John Galt?
45
posted on
12/27/2005 8:03:23 AM PST
by
jsmith48
(www.isupatriot.com)
To: Pylot
What happens to the oil providers when their biggest customer doesn't buy oil?
46
posted on
12/27/2005 8:04:07 AM PST
by
Ninian Dryhope
("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
To: OpusatFR
47
posted on
12/27/2005 8:04:08 AM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: jsmith48
I didn't say that. That is a generalization you're making as an overreaching mistatement of my remarks. It is called dishonest argumentation. Try again.
48
posted on
12/27/2005 8:06:55 AM PST
by
Havoc
(President George and King George.. coincidence?)
To: Havoc
With a tagline like...(President George and King George.. coincidence?)
One wonders. Tongue-in-cheek?
49
posted on
12/27/2005 8:11:48 AM PST
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
To: A Balrog of Morgoth
My tagline is a reflection of the fact that I disagree with my president on a few things.. trade is one of them. I'm not an indoctrinate for Bush..
50
posted on
12/27/2005 8:19:31 AM PST
by
Havoc
(President George and King George.. coincidence?)
To: montag813
"To get you to buy gold to increase his profits."
Over the past week or two, gold has fallen back substantially from its recent highs of $530.00 or so, now below $500.00/oz.
To: A Balrog of Morgoth
No paranoia involved, none at all.
Simply an usual ability to see connections and draw relevant conclusions, far beyond the less intelligent sort of people.
52
posted on
12/27/2005 8:25:53 AM PST
by
Ninian Dryhope
("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
To: hubbubhubbub
Perhaps a bigger-than-expected shopping season, to go with the bigger-than-expected economic growth.
53
posted on
12/27/2005 8:34:52 AM PST
by
LS
To: Ninian Dryhope
You don't really think we would stop the economy here do you?? We use 25 out of every 100 barrels of oil produced.
The threat to the US from these oil suppliers demanding payment in Euros is that our outbound dollar flow would be seriously interrupted. That would have an enormous impact on you and me. As long as we increase the money supply everything is fine. Oil provides a great mechanism for moving our dollars out of the US. Disrupt that and there will be hades to pay.
Imagine that we had to purchase Euros in order to purchase oil.
That may not be the only reason we went after Saddam (which I totally support by the way) but you can bet that it was a factor.
In any case the connection to the currency that the oil producers accept in payment and the state of our economy may not be as distant as you assume.
54
posted on
12/27/2005 8:35:49 AM PST
by
Pylot
To: One_who_hopes_to_know
Not at all surprised. Investment demands dollars. This is supply-side 101/basic George Gilder.
I lived through the 1970s, and am MUCH less concerned about inflation than the impact of deflation. At least with inflation---unless it reaches Weimar Germany proportions---there is a psychology of "good times," but with deflation, studies have shown that even when people actually may be doing better, the perception of falling wages is depressing and has all sorts of spinoff effects.
55
posted on
12/27/2005 8:37:35 AM PST
by
LS
To: Pylot
So, do you think we invaded Iraq to keep them from selling their oil in Euros?
56
posted on
12/27/2005 8:38:38 AM PST
by
Ninian Dryhope
("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
To: Pylot
The threat to the US from these oil suppliers demanding payment in Euros is that our outbound dollar flow would be seriously interrupted. That would have an enormous impact on you and me. As long as we increase the money supply everything is fine. Oil provides a great mechanism for moving our dollars out of the US. Disrupt that and there will be hades to pay. Imagine that we had to purchase Euros in order to purchase oil.
Do you notice the flaw in your reasoning?
57
posted on
12/27/2005 8:41:02 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
To: Ninian Dryhope
Author shows himself to be a moonbat and thus he may be safely ignored. I happen to subscribe to this so called 'moonbat'.
I can assure you, he is no moonbat.
The other 'moonbat' I subscribe to is a foreign currency analyst...and that 'moonbat' agrees with this 'moonbat'.
Both of these 'moonbats' have been right about 80% of the time this year...
Perhaps you could pose a counter argument in favor of massive inflationary fed practices, the desire for an inverted yield curve, surging trade deficits, surging debt, monetization of the debt by the fed, and surging commodity prices...
When you have your argument together let me know...
58
posted on
12/27/2005 8:43:10 AM PST
by
antaresequity
((PUSH 1 FOR ENGLISH, PUSH 2 TO BE DEPORTED))
To: antaresequity
Perhaps you could pose a counter argument in favor of massive inflationary fed practicesYou can show there is massive inflation?
surging trade deficits
Why are trade deficits bad?
surging debt
Surging household net worth.
monetization of the debt by the fed
Not happening.
and surging commodity prices...
Yeah, funny thing about supply and demand.....
59
posted on
12/27/2005 8:46:28 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(The Federal Reserve did not kill JFK. Greenspan was not on the grassy knoll.)
To: antaresequity
Right, we went to Iraq to keep Iraq from selling its oil in Euros. The man is a genius. No wonder you pay him for his expertize.
60
posted on
12/27/2005 8:52:04 AM PST
by
Ninian Dryhope
("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson