Replies

1. Is it contingent? If No, then it is produced by necessity. If Yes, go to 2.
2. Is it complex? If No, then it is produced by chance. If Yes, go to 3.
3. Is it specified? If No, then it is produced by chance. If Yes, go to 4.

4. It is designed.

This is called testing a theory? Taking 3 nebulous characteristics and drawing a premature conclusion from their supposed presence?

I guess what you show is indeed an accurate portrayal of the scientific validity of intelligent design.

This is called testing a theory? Taking 3 nebulous characteristics and drawing a premature conclusion from their supposed presence?

What is it about something being either Contingent, Complex or Specified that is nebulous to you?

I guess what you show is indeed an accurate portrayal of the scientific validity of intelligent design.

And I guess this little dart is indicitive of the basis from which you operate concerning the debate over IDT or ET. Mocking my, or anyone's post in this way is not you showing superior argument rather it is you belittling without some sincere rebuttal. Should I respond that this is an accurate portrayal of how closed minded someone can be? I don't begin with that, Quark.