[razzle]

Dude, you can believe what you want about fish crawling up on land and becoming elephants, etc. But don't go claiming ID is a cancer on conservatism. ID has "evidence" also, perhaps you'd be open minded enough to read it like I read your "evidence (BS)" See Dec/Jan 06 American Spectator http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=9185.

[VadeRetro]

Inane wave-away. Your Spectator article is not evidence. It's a vague mumble that some "scientists" somewhere, mostly at the un-Discovery Institute in Seattle, think they see evidence in complexity.

Nah!

Irreducible Complexity is consistent with evolution.

Real information theory does not support ID.

I have all the evidence of the last 150 years, as you have supposedly reviewed from my last post. You have mumbles, endlessly repeated no matter how often refuted.

[VadeRetro]

Dude, you can believe what you want about fish crawling up on land and becoming elephants, etc.

Actually, that particular demonstration is not in the materials posted to you, except that if you follow the links down far enough you can find the Kathleen Hunt web article Ichneumon used to piece that justly famous post together. Obviously, you've heard of it from somewhere.

Here's fish-to-elephant in 50 steps of "microevolution". So I'm not just believing what I want to about it. I'm following the evidence as opposed to ignoring it.