To: b_sharp
I would have pointed out that his response was a complete non-sequitur and a cowardly dodge of the fact that creationists are repeatedly defending the repitition of a known lie, but I don't respond to Baraonda anymore, since he -- like Running Wolf -- has made it clear that he has absolutely no interest whatsoever in presenting any information to support his claims (and then there's the fact that a number of his claims are demonstratable lies).
483 posted on
12/29/2005 3:09:42 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
"I would have pointed out that his response was a complete non-sequitur and a cowardly dodge of the fact that creationists are repeatedly defending the repitition of a known lie, but I don't respond to Baraonda anymore, since he -- like Running Wolf -- has made it clear that he has absolutely no interest whatsoever in presenting any information to support his claims (and then there's the fact that a number of his claims are demonstratable lies). Ya, I know. But you know me, sometimes I just can't resist. I'm sure some lurker somewhere got a laugh out of it.
487 posted on
12/29/2005 6:48:39 PM PST by
b_sharp
(Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson