I really should?? About presumptious of you. I read of this in the early eighties. Tell me, what Creationist conspiracy tin-foil hat wearing website would it have been from? Sheesh, is everything raised as a question presumed dismissable to you on this subject??
I've noticed that there are currently six or seven active crevo threads, all covering the same ground after twenty or so postings. Would there be any advantage in trying to keep everything in just one, like what happened with the discussions on Katrina?
Just a thought.
Exerpt:
For many years claims were made by strict creationists that human footprints or "giant man tracks" occur alongside dinosaur tracks in the limestone beds of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose Texas. If true, such a finding would dramatically contradict the conventional geologic timetable, which holds that humans did not appear on earth until over 60 million years after the dinosaurs became extinct. However, the "man track" claims have not stood up to close scientific scrutiny, and have been abandoned even by most creationists. The supposed human tracks have involved a variety of phenomena, including forms of elongate (metatarsal) dinosaur tracks, erosional features, indistinct markings of uncertain origin, and some doctored and carved specimens (most of the latter on loose blocks of rock). This Web site provides a collection of articles reviewing the history of the controversy and evidence involved, articles on other alleged out-of-order fossils and artifacts, and information and links on dinosaur tracks in general [emphasis added].