[Dog Gone]

I guess I wouldn't have a problem with it if such a comparison was an elective course and not required. The issue, though, is that Intelligent Design is not science. It fails the tests of what science is.

You can't elevate ID to an equally valid explanation simply because you want to. There are dozens, if not hundreds, of alternate explanations to evolution, from Scientology to ancient Indian legends. Would you have the schools teach them all? Treat them all as equally valid explanations?

[Paige]

Indian legends? They worshipped the spirt(S)(all type of g-ds). Is this all you have other than man's findings? Honestly if this is what you are going to use as an explanation of evolution please do not insult my intelligence. Thanks :)