[b_sharp]

Most of the post you linked to is about the lack of mention of Israel, or the mention of Israel already in Canaan and uses this as evidence that the exodus had already occurred. How is this evidence that there was an exodus?

[x5452]

Firtly, most historical texts are regarded as first person accounts.

Dismissing all first person account gives a very different view of history. Usually archaeologists take first person accounts as gospel. Unless of course it turns out to BE gospel.

That being the case we have 1 first person account, and then we have folks like you who refuse to show evidence that the first person account is wrong, and suggest it is because archaeologists can't unearth evidence of something occuring that long ago.