To: betty boop; Stultis
LOLOLOL! I have been playing "catch up" having been gone for about 5 days and when I ran across this post I simply laughed out loud.
betty boop, as you say, you and I are polar opposites of "new agers" - we are "old agers".
Seriously, by "old ager," I mean we stick with God's revelation, as shown forth in the holy scriptures and in "the book of nature." I don't think I speak for myself alone when I say there are no "new" truths under the sun, only God's truth, from the beginning....
Amen!!!
Jeepers, I laughed so hard that I now must take a break from the keyboard. Thank you so much for the ping - I'll see you around this evening perhaps.
To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop
Well, I probably should have used "Christian" as the noun and "new age" as the modifying adjective, rather than the reverse. But I'll persist in considering you guys identifiably "new age-ish", if at the same time and otherwise orthodox Christian. Face it, you're not gonna find very many conservative Christians who are (just for instance) enthusiastic about the Birkenstock clad "holistic" thinkers at the Sante Fe Institute.
64 posted on
12/27/2005 2:21:55 PM PST by
Stultis
(I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson