Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stultis

"On this view God is not limited to breaking the laws nature in order to govern it. He can direct nature without doing so. Indeed there may be, in the end, no proper distinction between "God's purposes" and the evolution of nature according to it's "natural" course."

I am ok with that. Its still ID in my book...maybe not the ID promoted by ID'rs, but still ID.

Of course, in order for the miracles of Christianity to be true, God did have to intervene in a supernatural way at some point....fish don't multiply in a basket...a man cannot walk on water...etc.

And if one does not believe those miracles, then likely they don't believe that God became Man, and we are back to Christianity and water.


17 posted on 12/25/2005 12:12:05 PM PST by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: fizziwig
Its still ID in my book...maybe not the ID promoted by ID'rs, but still ID.

Even so, it isn't science (because it falls back on a supernatural cause, which is outside of the realm of scientific inquiry) and shouldn't be presented as such.
25 posted on 12/25/2005 12:53:26 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson