[SkyPilot]

The judge in this case is a hardened atheist who went out of his way to make a personal point. He even tried to inoculate criticism of his decision by spelling out that he wasn't an "activist judge" (yeah---right).

Judges who use the courts for their own little personal soapbox eventually lose all credibility and become bigger jokes than Judge Lance Ito. He deserves to be ridiculed for years for the drivel of an opinion he wrote.

[Dimensio]

The judge in this case is a hardened atheist

Evidence for this claim? Or do you just make arrogant, unsupportable proclamations about judges when you don't like their rulings?

[Thatcherite]

The judge in this case is a hardened atheist

An interesting claim, that you can doubtless back up with evidence...

[Rudder]

...this ruling might help ID proponents move at least some of its proposals onto a more solid scientifc footing.

The problem with this suggestion is that ID, at its very heart, is anti-science. These jerks will never get their act together because their basic premise is flawed.

[jess35]

The judge in this case is a hardened atheist who went out of his way to make a personal point. He even tried to inoculate criticism of his decision by spelling out that he wasn't an "activist judge" (yeah---right)

U.S. District Judge John E. Jones is a Conservative, a Bush appointee and a Christian. It shouldn't come as a surprise that the ID Holly Warriors immediately started spreading lies about him. Hey, but any lie that furthers the "cause" is righteous, isn't it?