[keithtoo]

Read this opinion from the U of Chicago law school. There is plenty of personal opinion injected into this judge's decision.

Sample from the first paragraph: " While professing to offer no opinion concerning the truth of intelligent design, the court consistently reveals its contempt for this theory.

http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/faculty/religion_/index.html

[Dimensio]

Maybe you could quote from the legal opinion itself rather than an editorial on the opinion which itself only quotes a historical note from the ruling and makes no attempt to explain where the judge's assessment of the evidence presented is in error.