ID is not science, but this case illustrates the limits of science, and the pitfalls of arguing such issues before a court. To observe and consider the intricate and amazing detail of the processes of life and NOT see an intelligent designer behind it all requires a stunning blindness. "The heavens declare the glory of God," says the psalmist. Yet there are none so blind as those who will not see.
Therefore ID is science.
I don't yet see the evidence, notwithstanding your claims that somehow you do. Sooner or later, we always get someone (not you, really) who posts something like this:
I pity you Darwinists. When I behold the wonders of creation, I know -- really know -- that there must be a Designer. [Translation -- Whenever I look around, my mind goes blank and I wet my pants.]
Blindness is an excuse? Read Dawkins' Blind Watchmaker or Climbing Mount Improbable. Alternatively, Herrnstein & Murray's The Bell Curve.