Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

David Parker, at odds with his community
Boston Globe ^ | December 22, 2005 | Tania Ralli

Posted on 12/24/2005 5:43:43 AM PST by lexfreedom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: GW and Twins Pawpaw

Surely it isn't. That's just me hijacking a thread. Nevermind.

< |:)~


21 posted on 12/24/2005 6:36:19 AM PST by martin_fierro (See what I did there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lexfreedom

"And it's by no means over."

Yes it is Mr. Parker. Smell the coffee while you still have a kitchen. You keep fighting for your rights in Massachusetts, you may lose your rights, your home, your family, your livelihood, your freedom, and your life. Get out of there while you still have everything but that one tail feather they bit off.

Now let me be. I have Boomer Bummer #59: just heard Lesley Gore is turning 60 and she's a lesbian. :(


22 posted on 12/24/2005 7:02:42 AM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
This article is pretty one sided. In the interest of "fair and balanced," I'd like to hear the other side's story

Well I would be happy to give the other side, but as earlier threads on this topic will tell you, either you concede that Parker is a hero or you are condemned as a deviate. David Parker is no hero and earlier threads reflected the lies told about the episode. He used his children as pawns in his political game, and made demands that could not have been met by any school. BTW, I thought it was against this forum's policy to have a member do fundraising on his own behalf?

23 posted on 12/24/2005 12:22:51 PM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68
BTW, I thought it was against this forum's policy to have a member do fundraising on his own behalf?

And??

This was the first thread I read about Parker.

24 posted on 12/24/2005 2:08:05 PM PST by upchuck (Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
And??

Wasn't referring to you upchuck. There are a number of threads on this dating back several months. I question those who link to a fundraiser for legal expenses incurred by anyone who starts the fracas and causes the legal expenses and then goes on a thread to keep the issue alive, even though charges were dropped.

As`for me, I can agree with the goal of MR. Parker but completely disagree with his tactics. They were unnecessary, deceitful, selfish, and a complete disservice to his children. If you are interested look up keyword Lexington or Parker, I believe for other threads.

25 posted on 12/24/2005 2:44:34 PM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68
BTW, I thought it was against this forum's policy to have a member do fundraising on his own behalf?

What makes you think that "lexfreedom" is David Parker? I don't think he even knows this forum exists. But rest assured there are plenty of people in Lexington that support David Parker and know the truth about what really happened. What he requested was well within his rights as a parent and could easily have been accommodated by the school.

What "lies" are you referring to? Or are you just a troll from "lexingtoncares"?

 

Support David Parker ! Visit:

www.davidparkerfund.org

26 posted on 12/26/2005 5:44:30 AM PST by lexfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lexfreedom
What makes you think that "lexfreedom" is David Parker? I don't think he even knows this forum exists.

Have it your way. But since you are either him or know him personally, for you to say he doesn't even know this forum exists when you are doing a fundraising for him pretty much speaks for your credibility, doesn't it?

What he requested was well within his rights as a parent and could easily have been accommodated by the school.

He and the school could easily have been accomodated with their original offer, but what "he" wanted was publicity, not accomodation, and his children were simply pawns in that publicity scheme.

If you want to know what lies I am referring to, go back to earlier threads on this topic, and I have never heard of lexintoncares, but will check it out, thanks.

27 posted on 12/26/2005 6:18:57 AM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson