Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1
Judge who resigned over NSA program a partisan Clintonista
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1546051/posts

Same judge????

11 posted on 12/23/2005 8:41:45 AM PST by Valpal1 (Crush jihadists, drive collaborators before you, hear the lamentations of their media. Allahu FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Valpal1; Carl/NewsMax; FairOpinion; Howlin; Peach
"Judge who resigned over NSA program a partisan Clintonista http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1546051/posts

Same judge????"

Excellent question. Can anyone dig into this possibility?

16 posted on 12/23/2005 8:54:05 AM PST by MizSterious (Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Valpal1

The judge who censured Resnick was Judge Royce Lamberth.


Here is an article about him.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0204.mencimer.html

"Lamberth proved he wasn't kidding in March last year when he censured Resnick. Unfortunately for Lamberth, after September 11, when the FBI received unexpected criticism for shoddy counterterrorist investigations, law enforcement officials blamed Lamberth. They argued that his censure had a chilling effect, making lawyers leery of seeking new wiretaps---such as the one critics say the bureau should have requested for Zacarias Moussaoui. Thought to be the "20th terrorist," Moussaoui is the Moroccan man arrested in August after he tried to learn how to fly a plane but not how to land it. (Officially, the FBI has denied that Lamberth had anything to do with the decision not to surveil Moussaoui.)

Because the whole episode is classified, it's impossible for the public to really know whether this was another case of Lamberth going ballistic over a minor bureaucratic snafu or a serious screwup by the Justice Department. Either way, civil libertarians were reassured simply to know that the judge really was exercising his oversight role on the court with an eye towards protecting constitutional rights.

"Lamberth has demonstrated a refreshing willingness to scrutinize government claims and to demand absolute accuracy from the government filings. You'd be surprised how rare that is," says Jonathan Turley, a professor of public interest law at George Washington University and one of the few lawyers actually to set foot inside the FISA court. "

I am sure Lambert can be proud that his "tough stance" on "protecting civil liberties" allowed 9-11-01 attacks to take place.

Do we need another major attack, before people wake up and realize that you have to be able to tap potential and actual terrorists conversations and be able to interrogate them, when captured, by whatever means necessary, to prevent an attack.


19 posted on 12/23/2005 9:17:26 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson