Those are the children most likely to be abused or taken advantage of by adults.
"Those are the children most likely to be abused or taken advantage of by adults."
Having read the story, wherein it states that the father of the boy placed him in an out of state rehabilitation facility, I deduced the following:
1. The boy probably was in a rehabilitation facility for drug users, as there are no rehab centers for "15 year old boys who screw 20 year old porn stars".
2. The father seems to have achieved some financial success, based upon his being able to place the boy in an out of state facility.
If I am correct in the above deductions, then I must ask for a definition of the "Those - - children". Are you saying that the children of affluent families are most likely to be abused or taken advantage of?
While I don't think that leaving home was a wise move on the part of the boy, for such a 15 year old male to take up the offer of a sexual relationship with what must be a relatively attractive 20 year old female used to be readily understood.
"Used to" = before political correctness and Liberals in agencies intruding into how a family raises their children.
One can't help both wondering if the boy knew of her past, and whether the boy contracted any diseases from his less than well thought out affair.
But, given the horniness of 15 year old males, for Americans to criminalize nature is an astonishing act of legal hubris.
Next to be legislated, laws requiring cats to be herded, and for all snakes to lay in straight lines.