[Go Gordon]

If told only non-smokers were to apply, she should not have applied. If you can't live with the rules, don't take the job.

Non-homosexual only hiring? Non-religeous people only hiring? Non-alcohol consuming people only? Non-fast food eating people only? Non-fat people only? Non-perfume/cologne using people only? My tag line probably applies to you.

[khnyny]

"Non-homosexual only hiring? Non-religeous people only hiring? Non-alcohol consuming people only? Non-fast food eating people only? Non-fat people only? Non-perfume/cologne using people only? My tag line probably applies to you."

Exactly, it's ridiculous. A have a prediction: companies in the future will give physicals to all prospective employees and those who don't "measure up" will not be hired. Employers want to avoid employees who could cost them money in health care costs.

[DumpsterDiver]

Non-homosexual only hiring? Non-religeous people only hiring? Non-alcohol consuming people only? Non-fast food eating people only? Non-fat people only? Non-perfume/cologne using people only?

As the freedom-loving (ha!) man in the article stated:

"It's positive discrimination and we're proud of it."

[lewislynn]

Non-homosexual only hiring? Non-religeous people only hiring? Non-alcohol consuming people only? Non-fast food eating people only? Non-fat people only? Non-perfume/cologne using people only?

Sounds good to me. Who would be next on the next government dictated must hire list? People who don't speak the language? Can't read or write?

[billbears]

No it's called freedom of association. Something that used to exist in this nation of states before federal regulation forced employers to accept anyone and anything against their will. The intent under the Constitution was not meant to apply to private companies but only a list of limitations of the national government