Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Junior Aide Had a Big Role in Terror Policy
NY Times ^ | 12/23/05 | Tim Golden

Posted on 12/22/2005 9:59:18 PM PST by hipaatwo

Moments after planes crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, lawyers in the Justice Department's elite Office of Legal Counsel began crowding into the office of one of the agency's newest deputies, John C. Yoo, to watch the horror unfold on his television set.

"We all stood around watching this event and he just seemed very calm, like he wasn't going to let these terrorists stop him from doing his work," recalled Robert J. Delahunty, a friend of Mr. Yoo's who worked in the office.

Fearful of another attack and told that all "nonessential personnel" should evacuate, Mr. Delahunty and others streamed out of the department's headquarters and walked home. Mr. Yoo, then a 34-year-old former law professor whose academic work had focused on foreign affairs and war-powers issues, was asked to stay behind, and he quickly found himself in the department's command center, on the phone to lawyers at the White House.

Within weeks, Mr. Yoo had begun to establish himself as a critical player in the Bush administration's legal response to the terrorist threat, and an influential advocate for the expansive claims of presidential authority that have been a hallmark of that response.

While a mere deputy assistant attorney general in the legal counsel office, Mr. Yoo was a primary author of a series of legal opinions on the fight against terrorism, including one that said the Geneva Conventions did not apply and at least two others that countenanced the use of highly coercive interrogation techniques on terror suspects. Recently, current and former officials said he also wrote a still-secret 2002 memorandum that gave legal backing to the administration's secret program to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States without federal warrants.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bleedingheartattack; johncyoo; johnyoo; nyslimes; nytimes; patriotleak; spying; timgolden; yoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 12/22/2005 9:59:19 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Howlin; Peach; Ernest_at_the_Beach

FYI..more from the slimes


2 posted on 12/22/2005 10:00:08 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
John Yoo is smarter than all employees of the Times combined.
3 posted on 12/22/2005 10:08:33 PM PST by msnimje (Political Correctness -- An OFFENSIVE attempt not to offend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

He was a law professor and in the next sentence they say he was a mere deputy assistant, like he just graduated from college. A@@holes.


4 posted on 12/22/2005 10:10:13 PM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

"Yesterday, with controversy brewing again about some of the policies on which Mr. Yoo worked, he said he was unmoved.

"If you're being criticized for what you did and you believe that what you did was right, you shouldn't take it lying down," he said. "You should go out and defend yourself."


I like this guy.


5 posted on 12/22/2005 10:32:34 PM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
It;s Yoo fault.
6 posted on 12/22/2005 10:33:34 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Institute for Corean-American Studies



John C. Yoo
Biographic Sketch

PRESENT POSITION


Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice
Deputy Assistant Attorney General. 2001-present.


Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley
Professor of Law. 1999-present. (on leave of absence)
Acting Professor of Law. 1993-99.
Director, International Legal Studies Program, 1999-2001.


Subjects: Constitutional Law, Foreign Relations Law, International Civil
Litigation, Separation of Powers, Civil Procedure, International Trade,
International Law & Ethics


PREVIOUS POSITIONS


Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate
General Counsel. 1995-1996.


Justice Clarence Thomas
Law Clerk. U.S. Supreme Court. 1994-95.


Judge Laurence H. Silberman
Law Clerk. U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. 1992-93.


Summer Positions
Covington & Burling (1991); Skadden, Arps, (1991); Dechert, Price &
Rhoads (1990); White House Counsel (1990); Wall St. Journal (1989);
Boston Globe (1988)


EDUCATION


Yale Law School
J.D., 1992
Articles Editor, Yale Law Journal
Teaching Assistant, Prof. Harold Koh
Research Assistant, Prof. Stephen Carter
University Advisory Committee on Investor Responsibility


Harvard University
A.B., summa cum laude, History, 1989
History Dept. Prize, Washburn Prize, Detur Prize, Phi Beta Kappa,
Harvard Scholarship
Deputy Editorial Chairman, The Harvard Crimson


PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND AWARDS


Council on Foreign Relations
Federalist Society
Society of Historians of American Foreign Relations
Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Bar of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit


Paul M. Bator Award, Federalist Society, 2001.
Chair, Section on Scholarship, Association of American Law Schools, 2000.
Scholar-in-Residence, George Washington University Law School, 1998-99
John M. Olin Foundation Fellowship, 1998-99
Visiting Professor, Free University of Amsterdam, 1998
Junior Faculty Research Grant, University of California, Berkeley, 1997-98
Salvatori Fellowship, Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1997
American-German Young Leader, American Council on Germany, 1997


Director, Harvard Alumni Association
Scholars Advisory Panel, National Constitution Center
Advisory Committee, Department of Justice Transition Team, Bush/Cheney
Transition
Co-Chair, Law Professors for Bush/Cheney
Board of Editors, Berkeley Journal of International Law
Board of Editors, Asian Law Journal


PUBLICATIONS


Articles and Essays


Politics as Laws?: The ABM Treaty, the Separation of Powers, and Treaty
Interpretation, 89 Cal. L. Rev. 851-915 (2001).


The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Federalism Theories, 79 Tex.
L. Rev
. 1459-1523 (2001) (with Sai Prakash).


Laws as Treaties?: The Constitutionality of the Congressional-Executive
Agreement, 99 Mich. L. Rev. 757-852 (2001).


Choosing Justices: A Political Appointments Process and the Wages of
Judicial Supremacy, 98 Mich. L. Rev. 1436-67 (2000) (review essay).


Kosovo, War Powers, and the Multilateral Future, 148 U. Pa. L. Rev.
1673-1731 (2000).


Treaties and Public Lawmaking: A Textual and Structural Defense of
Non-Self-Execution, 99 Colum. L. Rev. 2210-2252 (1999).


Globalism and the Constitution: Treaties, Legislative Power, and the
Original Understanding, 99 Colum. L. Rev. 1955-2100 (1999).


The New Sovereignty and the Old Constitution: The Chemical Weapons
Convention and the Appointments Clause, 15 Constitutional Commentary
87-130 (1998).


The Judicial Safeguards of Federalism, 70 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1311-1405 (1997).


Who Measures the Chancellor's Foot?: The Inherent Remedial Powers of the
Federal Courts, 84 Cal. L. Rev. 1121-1177 (1996).


The Continuation of Politics by Other Means: The Original Understanding
of War Powers, 84 Cal. L. Rev. 167-305 (1996).


Our Declaratory Ninth Amendment, 42 Emory L.J. 967-1043 (1993).


Dollar Diplomacy/Dollar Defense: The Fabric of Economics and National
Security Law, 26 Int'l Law. 715 (1992) (with Harold Koh).


Marshall's Plan: The Early Supreme Court and Statutory Interpretation,
101 Yale L.J. 1607 (1992)


Symposium Contributions


Bush v. Gore: In Defense of the Court's Legitimacy, 68 U. Chi. L. Rev.
775-791 (2001)


The Scope of the Commerce Clause After Morrison, 25 OKCU L. Rev. 843-868
(2000) (with Jesse Choper)


U.N. Wars, U.S. War Powers, 1 Chic. J. Int'l L. 355-73 (2000).


Why Were International Legal Scholars MIA on Kosovo?, 1 Chicago J. Int'l
L
149-57 (2000).


Clio at War: The Use and Misuse of History in the War Powers Debate, 70
U. Colo. L. Rev. 1169-1222 (1999).


The First Claim: The Burr Trial, United States v. Nixon, and
Presidential Power, 83 Minn. L. Rev. 1435-79 (1999).


Lawyers in Congress, 61 L. & Contemporary Problems vol.2 1-19 (1998).


Sounds of Sovereignty: Defining Federalism in the 1990s, 32 Ind. L. Rev.
27-44 (1998).


Judicial Review and Federalism, 22 Harv. J. L.. & Pub. Pol'y 197 (1998).


Federal Courts as Weapons of Foreign Policy: The Case of the
Helms-Burton Act, 20 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 747-76 (1997)


Book Chapters


Congress and the Judiciary's Equitable Powers, in Reining in The
Imperial Judiciary
(Christopher Wolfe, ed., forthcoming 2002).


Bush v. Gore: In Defense of the Court's Legitimacy, in The Vote (Richard
Epstein & Cass Sunstein eds., 2001)


The States and Judicial Review in The Tenth Amendment and State
Sovereignty: Constitutional History and Contemporary Issues
(Mark
Killenbeck, ed., Rowman & Littlefield, forthcoming 2001).


The Imperial President Abroad, in The Rule of Law in the Wake of Clinton
(Roger Pilon ed., CATO Press 2000)


Biological and Chemical Weapon Treaties and the Constitution, in The New
Terror: Facing the Threat of Biological and Chemical Weapons
269-304
(Sidney Drell et al eds., Hoover Institution Press, 1999).


McCulloch v. Maryland as Constitutional Tragedy, in Constitutional
Stupidities, Constitutional Tragedies
241 (William N. Eskridge, Jr. &
Sanford Levinson eds., New York Univ. Press, 1998)


OTHER PUBLICATIONS


Missiles Away, Legal Times, May 7, 2001 (with Jack Goldsmith)
Missile Defense Defense, The American Lawyer, Apr. 2001 (with Jack
Goldsmith).
A Legislature's Duty, Wall St. J., Dec. 4, 2000.
The Right Moment for Judicial Power, New York Times, Nov. 25, 2000.
Bush Has a Federal Case, Wall St. J., Nov. 16, 2000.
Seattle and Sovereignty, Wall St. J., Dec. 6, 1999 (with Jack Goldsmith).
The Supreme Court Rediscovers an Old Clause, Wall St. J., May 24, 1999.
War Powers: Where Have All the Liberals Gone?, Wall St. J., March 15, 1999.
A Subpoenaed President, Wall St. J., July 20, 1998.
When Desegregation Turns into Discrimination, Wall St. J., May 26, 1998.
A Privileged Executive?, Wall St. J., March 2, 1998.
Criticizing Judges, 1 Greenbag 2d 277-287 (1998).
First, Uphold the Law, New York Times, Nov. 13, 1997.
John Huang's Immunity Ploy, Wall St. J., July 16, 1997.
How Congress's Subpoena Power Works, Wall St. J., May 28, 1997.
The Chemical Weapons Treaty is Unconstitutional, Wall St. J., April 16,
1997.
The Independent Counsel, in Encycl. of the Am. Constitution (L. Levy et
al. eds., 2000).
Editor's Notes, Alberico Gentili's De Legationibus Libri Tres (1594,
republished 1997)
Editor's Notes, William Whiting's War Powers Under the Constitution of
the United States
(1864, republished 1997)


TALKS AND PRESENTATIONS


Legal Responses to Terrorism, National Workshop for District Judges,
Federal Judicial Center, San Diego, CA (Dec. 3-4, 2001).


Legal Responses to Terrorism, District of Columbia Bar Association,
Washington, D.C. (Nov. 19, 2001).


Alien Tort Claims Act: Are American Courts the World's Policemen?,
Federalist Society Annual Lawyers Convention, Washington, D.C. (Nov. 16,
2001).


The Prosecution of Terrorists, Conference on War, Court, or Both,
American Society of International Law, Washington, D.C. (Oct. 12, 2001).


U.S. Approaches to Multilateral Treaties, Roundtable, New York
University Law School, New York, NY (Sept. 29, 2001).


Bush v. Gore and the Court's Legitimacy, Conference on Judicial Power,
Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (June 9, 2001).


International Law and American Federalism, American Enterprise
Institute, Washington, D.C. (Apr. 4, 2001).


The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Federalism Theories, Cardozo
School of Law, New York, NY (Apr. 2, 2001)


Bush v. Gore and the Legitimacy of the Supreme Court, Ecole Des Hautes
Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France (Mar. 30, 2001)


Foreign Affairs Federalism and the Separation of Powers, Federalism
Symposium, Villanova Law School, Villanova, PA (Oct. 28, 2000)


The Commerce Clause after Lopez and Morrison, Oklahoma City University
Law School, Symposium on Federalism, Oklahoma City, OK (Sept. 27, 2000)


The Imperial Presidency Abroad, Symposium on The Rule of Law in the Wake
of Clinton, Cato Institute, Washington, D.C. (July 12, 2000)


Federalism and Judicial Review, University of Montpelier Law School,
Montpelier, France (June 10, 2000)


The Constitutionality of Congressional-Executive Agreements, Public Law
Workshop, University of Chicago Law School, Chicago, IL (May 18, 2000)


International Law, the Treaty Power, and Domestic Litigation, American
Society of International Law, Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. (April 6,
2000)


U.N. Wars, U.S. War Powers, American Enterprise Institute, Washington,
D.C. (April 5, 2000)


Kosovo and Multilateral War Powers, University of Utah School of Law,
Salt Lake City, UT (Mar. 23, 2000).


Liberty, Resistance, and the Rule of Law, Liberty Fund Colloquium, New
Orleans, LA (Mar. 9-12, 2000)


Globalization and the Constitution, Athenaeum Speakers Series,
Claremont-McKenna College, Claremont, CA (Feb. 17, 2000)


Separation of Powers and Foreign Policy, Federalist Society National
Lawyers Convention, Washington, D.C. (Nov. 13, 1999) (panel chair)


Ethics and Post-Cold War Humanitarian Intervention: Beyond Realism and
Idealism, Department of Political Science, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
(Nov. 6, 1999) (panel chair).


Supreme Court 1998 Term, Conference of the U.S. District Court, Northern
District of California, Asilomar, CA (Oct. 18, 1999).


The Spirit of the Laws, Robbins Collection, Boalt Hall, (Oct. 15-16,
1999) (panel chair).


The Separation of Powers and the 20th Century, Federal Bar Association,
Sacramento, CA (Sept. 25, 1999)


Testimony on H.R. 1082: The Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 1999,
Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington,
D.C. (August 4, 1999).


Supreme Court 1998 Term, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, D.C. (July
12, 1999).


Supreme Court 1998 Term, Judicial Conference, U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Eighth Circuit, Kansas City, Missouri (July 9, 1999).


Criticizing Judges and Judicial Independence, Judicial Conference, U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Kansas City, Missouri (July 8,
1999)


Established Religion and Compelled Speech: Links Between the Framing of
the First Amendment of the Constitution and Modern Speech Doctrine, The
Robbins Collection in Religious and Civil Law & La Veme Section de
l'Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Sciences Religieuses, La Sorbonne
(June 3, 1999).


Supreme Court 1998 Term, National Association of Attorneys General,
Boise ID (May 27, 1999)


Regulation of Federal Judicial Appellate Jurisdiction under the Prison
Litigation Reform Act, Federal Judicial Center Seminar for Federal
Appellate Judges, Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA (April 15, 1999).


Treaties as Public Lawmaking, William and Mary Law School Faculty
Colloquium, Williamsburg, VA (March 26, 1999).


Delegating Sovereignty: Constitutional and Legal Implications of US
Participation in Treaty Regimes, Center for International Studies, New
York University, New York, NY (Feb. 27, 1999) (participant).


Impeachment and the Rule of Law, Federalist Society, University of North
Carolina Law School, Charlotte, North Carolina (Feb. 10, 1999).


Clio at War: The Misuse of History in the War Powers Debate, University
of Colorado Law Review Symposium, Boulder, CO (Jan. 22, 1999).


The Independent Counsel Statute in the Next Century, Federalist Society
Law Scholars Panel, Association of American Law Schools Annual Meeting,
New Orleans, LA (Jan. 6, 1998) (panel chair).


Impeachment and the Rule of Law, San Francisco Unified School District
Teachers Retreat, San Francisco, CA (Dec. 8, 1998).


Impeachment and President Clinton, Federalist Society Lawyers Chapter,
Sacramento, CA (Dec. 7, 1998).


Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability, 100th Anniversary
Symposium, University of Southern California Law School, Los Angeles, CA
(Nov. 20, 1998).


Regulation of Biological and Chemical Weapons, Hoover
Institution/Stanford University Conference on Biological and Chemical
Weapons, Stanford, CA (Nov. 17, 1998).


The Clinton Administration and the Rule of Law, Federalist Society
Lawyer's Chapter, Pittsburgh, PA (Nov. 4, 1998).


Presidential Privileges in the Age of Clinton, University of Minnesota
Law Review Symposium, University of Minnesota Law School, Minneapolis,
MN (Oct. 20, 1998).


Treaties as Public Lawmaking, University of Virginia Law School Faculty
Workshop, Charlottesville, VA (Oct. 9, 1998).


Political Participation in the Reformation of State Institutions,
American Political Philosophy Association, Symposium on Judicial
Imperialism, Washington, D.C. (Oct. 2, 1998).


The October 1997 Supreme Court Term, Judicial Conference of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, White Sulphur Springs, West
Virginia (June 27, 1998)


The Law and Politics of the Independent Counsel Statute, Institute for
Governmental Studies, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
(April 22, 1998)


The Senate's Prerogatives in the Judicial Appointments Process,
Federalist Society, University of Chicago Law School, Chicago, IL (Apr.
20, 1998).


Sounds of Sovereignty: Federalism in the 1990's, Symposium on "National
Power and State Autonomy," Indiana University Law School, Bloomington,
IN (Apr. 17, 1998)


The Original Understanding of the Treaty Power, Berkeley Journal of
International Law Symposium, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of
California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (Apr. 6, 1998)


The Treaty Power, University of San Diego Law School, San Diego, CA
(Mar. 16, 1998)


Federalism in the 1990's, Federalist Society Student Symposium, New York
University Law School, New York, NY (March 7, 1998)


Are Property Rights an International Human Right?, Federalist Society
National Symposium, Practice Group on National Security and
International Law, Washington, D.C. (Oct. 17, 1997).


Unilateral Trade Sanctions and the World Trade Organization, Trade with
Asia: Legal Challenges for the Next Century, Berkeley Journal of
International Law Symposium, Berkeley, CA (Sept. 20, 1997).


The Clash of Civilizations?: The Rule of Law and International Affairs,
German-American Young Leaders Conference, American Council on Germany,
Hamburg, Germany, (Aug. 25, 1997)


The Original Understanding of the Treaty Power, Society for Historians
of American Foreign Relations, Washington, D.C., Annual Meeting (June
22, 1997)


Federal Courts and Equitable Remedies, Hastings College of Law,
University of California, San Francisco, CA (March 21, 1997)


The Political Relationship Between the Supreme Court and Congress, Legal
Studies Department, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
(March 19, 1997)


The Judicial Protection of Individual Rights and State Sovereignty,
Conference on Privileges and Rights of Citizenship: Law and the
Juridical Construction of Civil Society, Robbins Collection, Boalt Hall
School of Law, Berkeley, CA (March 14, 1997)


East Timor and International Law, Conference on East Timor, Portuguese
Studies Program, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
(March 1, 1997)


The Political Independence of the Federal Judiciary, testimony before
the American Bar Association, Commission on the Separation of Powers and
Judicial Independence, San Francisco, CA (February 21, 1997)


The Federal Judiciary and the Senate, Public Law Seminar, Political
Science Department, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
(February 19, 1997)


Helms-Burton and the Use of Federal Courts as Weapons of Foreign Policy,
Hastings College of Law, University of California, Symposium on the
Helms-Burton Act (January 1997).


McCulloch v. Maryland as a Constitutional Tragedy, Association of
American Law Schools, Section on Interpretation, Washington, D.C.,
Annual Meeting (January 1997)


The Inherent Remedial Power of the Federal Courts, The Heritage
Foundation, Washington, D.C., Symposium on Judicial Power (December 1996).


Limits on the Federal Judicial Power, The Federalist Society,
Washington, D.C., National Symposium on the Federal Judiciary (November
1996).


School Desegregation and the Federal Judicial Power, Federalist Society,
New York University Law School, New York, NY (October, 1996).


The Chemical Weapons Convention and the Limits of American Sovereignty,
testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on the
Constitution, Washington, D.C. (Sept. 10, 1996).


The Original Understanding of War Powers, The Society for Historians of
American Foreign Relations, Boston, MA, Annual Meeting (June, 1994).





ICAS Web Site Links for John C. Yoo:

Winter 2002 Liberty Award Dinner
Immigrant and Civic Duty
ICAS Liberty Award





This page last updated 1/27/2002 jdb

7 posted on 12/23/2005 2:48:32 AM PST by B4Ranch (No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Definitely a case of, "Yoo had to be there."


8 posted on 12/23/2005 5:23:42 AM PST by jigsaw (God Bless Our Troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

lol


9 posted on 12/23/2005 5:24:44 AM PST by beyond the sea (If you need a really new idea ..................... read a really old book.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Why he's just a kid! He was way out of his league. No wonder he over reached.


This is getting ridiculous!!


10 posted on 12/23/2005 7:00:09 AM PST by sgtyork (If Osamma calls someone in the US, should the NSA hang up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sgtyork

Let's see the resume of the writers from the times that are opining on this matter!


11 posted on 12/23/2005 7:03:57 AM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees have decided to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Just a lil ol' college intern.


12 posted on 12/23/2005 7:10:06 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tiki

He was just out of high school and carrying a teddy bear.


13 posted on 12/23/2005 7:12:19 AM PST by sgtyork (If Osamma calls someone in the US, should the NSA hang up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Marine_Uncle; Coop; Cap Huff; Dog; ...

Very good....pinging others.


14 posted on 12/23/2005 11:41:06 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; hipaatwo
Good factoid here:

Justice Clarence Thomas
Law Clerk. U.S. Supreme Court. 1994-95.

15 posted on 12/23/2005 11:43:31 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks for ping. Will examine. Have a safe and enjoyable holiday.


16 posted on 12/23/2005 11:47:20 AM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle; B4Ranch; hipaatwo; Grampa Dave
The NY Times is setting him up....he NOT ONLY is connected with Supreme Court Justice Thomas but also ......VP Cheney......HORRORS

I say we ditch Aliota and nominate Yoo for the Supreme Court!!!

Mr. Yoo's belief in the wide inherent powers of the president as commander in chief was strongly shared by one of the most influential legal voices in the administration's policy debates on terrorism, David S. Addington, then the counsel to Vice President Dick Cheney. Documents and interviews suggest that those views have been part of the legal arguments underpinning not only coercive interrogation and the prosecution of terrorism suspects before military tribunals but also the eavesdropping program.

Some current and former officials said the urgency of events after Sept. 11 and the close ties that Mr. Yoo developed with Mr. Addington (who is now Mr. Cheney's chief of staff), Mr. Gonzales, Mr. Flanigan and the general counsel of the Defense Department, William J. Haynes II, had sometimes led him to bypass the elaborate clearance process to which opinions from the legal counsel office were normally subjected.

Mr. Yoo's January 2002 conclusions that the Geneva Conventions did not apply to the conflict in Afghanistan and that the conventions' minimum standards did not cover terrorists touched off a long, hard-fought battle within the administration, in which lawyers for the State Department and the military services strongly disputed his views. Thereafter, several senior officials said, those lawyers were sometimes excluded from the drafting of more delicate opinions.

For example, they said, Mr. Yoo's much-criticized 2002 memorandum with Mr. Bybee on interrogations - which said that United States law prohibited only methods that would cause "lasting psychological harm" or pain "akin to that which accompanies serious physical injury such as death or organ failure" - was not shared with either State Department or military lawyers, despite its implications for their agencies.

"They were not getting enough critical feedback from within O.L.C., or from within the Justice Department, or from other agencies," one former official said of Mr. Yoo's opinions. Officials said senior aides to Attorney General Ashcroft also complained that they were not adequately informed about some of the Mr. Yoo's frequent discussions with the White House.

Mr. Yoo said he had always duly notified Justice Department officials or other agencies about the opinions he provided except when "I was told by people very high in the government not to for classification reasons."

17 posted on 12/23/2005 11:56:54 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The NYSlimes isn't good enough to line my litter boxes with.


18 posted on 12/23/2005 11:58:15 AM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
" I say we ditch Aliota and nominate Yoo for the Supreme Court!!!"
Perhaps your suggestion should be considered. Surely anyone GTW suggests is going to get one heck of a going over unless he was to suggest some ACLU lawyer or something. Then of course all would praise his judgement and fairplay.
19 posted on 12/23/2005 6:24:37 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo; Cindy; Fedora

Old time’s sake “Bleeding Heart Attack” / “War on the War” update : This article features some of the people who were targetting VP Cheney & Mr. Yoo :

Conflict Over Spying Led White House to Brink
Washington Post ^ | September 14, 2008 | Barton Gellman

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2082406/posts?page=13

Posted on Sunday, September 14, 2008 10:49:44 PM by An American!

This is the first of two stories adapted from “Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency,” to be published Tuesday by Penguin Press. EXCERPT: “The United States was at war with al-Qaeda, intelligence-gathering is inherent in war, and the Constitution appoints the president commander in chief.

But they had not been asked to give their own written assessments of the legality of domestic espionage. They based their answer in part on the attorney general’s certification of the “form and legality” of the president’s orders. Yet neither man had been allowed to see the program’s codeword-classified legal analyses [5], which were prepared by John C. Yoo, Addington’s close ally in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel. Now they wanted to read Yoo’s opinions for themselves [6].”

The more questions they asked, the less Goldsmith and Philbin liked the answers. Parts of the program fell easily within the constitutional powers of the commander in chief. Others looked dicier.

The two lawyers worked at the intersection of three complex systems: telecommunications, spy technology, and the statutory regimes that governed surveillance. After a few weeks, Goldsmith said, he decided the program “was the biggest legal mess I’d seen in my life.”

He asked for permission to read in Attorney General John D. Ashcroft’s new deputy, James B. Comey [14]. As always, he found Addington waiting with Gonzales in the White House counsel’s corner office, one floor up from the chief of staff. They sat in parallel wing chairs, much as Bush and Cheney did in the Oval Office.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


20 posted on 09/14/2008 11:32:14 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson