[middie]

If, in fact, it becomes a pending problem for my community, which I doubt, we'll deal with it then according to the will of the people. To wring one's hands over a non-existent, hypothetical and peripheral future community problem is an indication that one has too little to be concerned about and is searching for an issue to worry about. The sexual conduct of other adults, in private, without force, unwilling exploitation, violence or coercion is absolutely no one's business; including--and especially, the government's.

It continues to amaze that the very strong advocates for getting government out of our business conduct is all-too-willing to create law that mandates government oversee our sexual proclivities and punish that conduct of which the ''blue noses'' and ''church ladies'' say are not acceptable (unless engaged in by them in private. Hey, stay the hell out of my bedroom or the bedroom(s) of those who invite others to come in.

[little jeremiah]

Will reply more later.

Since this pro-orgy club decision was not voted on directly by people, or by elected officials, but was merely a judicial decision (and not unanimous), which side is forcing what on people?

Liberaltarians love to talk about over arching government, but they're the ones depending on Nazgul judges enforcing their immorality on people. Let communities decide their own standards. How about that one?