Intellectual masturbation like this will give you hairy palms.
Hi Rudder. I'd reply and have a conversation with you, but you didn't give me much to work with here. Let's try again.
I was merely making an observation on one small element of the judge's decision, namely his quote from Behe's testimony contrasted with how ID proponents generally argue the a priori exclusion of the supernatural (which the judge adopted elsewhere in his opinion).
How is any of that "intellectual masturbation"?