You really should read Behe's testimony (it's here at FR). In the beginning of this trial the defendants took the position that ID was not proposing anything to do with the supernatural. It seemed clear that position was designed to ward off any conclusion that might view ID as a religious concept. Any way, Behe's statements while on the stand are very interesting to read...he simply gets befuddled and is his own worst enemy.
Interesting point. Thanks for pointing me to source material, in this case Behe's testimony. So far, I've only been reading and referencing the Dover decision language.
I'll look for, and read, Behe's testimony and draw my conclusions further after I've read that.