To: gondramB
So religion is automatically anti-intellectual? Only Darwin's truth is allowed in schools? And how excited do you really think 9th graders are over evolution anyway? It's about much more than 9th grade biology, isn't it?
10 posted on
12/22/2005 1:53:28 PM PST by
mlc9852
To: mlc9852
"So religion is automatically anti-intellectual? Only Darwin's truth is allowed in schools?"
you know the answer to that..no and no. But forcing schools to teach science that scientists don't believe in is anti-intelectual.
As for Darwin - he was 100 years ago and most of his work has been superceded.
14 posted on
12/22/2005 1:55:32 PM PST by
gondramB
(Rightful liberty is unobstructed action within limits of the equal rights of others.)
To: mlc9852
So religion is automatically anti-intellectual? No, only some of the more bone-headed practitioners and failed concepts.
Only Darwin's truth is allowed in schools?
I have no trouble presenting ideas like ID where they belong: in theology or philosophy classes.
15 posted on
12/22/2005 1:55:59 PM PST by
blowfish
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson