Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: technomage
As an initial matter, I emphasize a few points. The President stated that these activities are " crucial to our national security." The President further explained that "the unauthorized disclosure of this effort damages our national security and puts our citizens at risk. Revealing classified information is illegal, alerts our enemies, and endangers our country." These critical national security activities remain classified. All United States laws and policies governing the protection and nondisclosure of national security information. including the information relating to the activities described by the President, remain in full force and effect. The unauthorized disclosure of classified infomiation violates federal criminal law. The Government may provide further classified briefings to the Congress on these activities in an appropriate manner. Any such briefings will be conducted in a manner that will not endanger national security.

That's about as strong of a "beatdown" as you'll ever see come from an executive agency to the Senate.
31 posted on 12/22/2005 12:23:59 PM PST by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: July 4th

It would have been perfect had he added the following:

"Mr. Rockefeller, you have the right to remain silent..."


37 posted on 12/22/2005 12:26:56 PM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: July 4th

"Any such briefings will be conducted in a manner that will not endanger national security."

Meaning "your access to classified information has been terminated!"


56 posted on 12/22/2005 12:38:30 PM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees have decided to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: July 4th
Any such briefings will be conducted in a manner that will not endanger national security.

It also sounds very much like the NSA will decline to tell the Committee sources and methods in the future, doesn’t it?

The Dems may have cooked their goose this time, I think the NSA is tired of being beaten down by the likes of Rockefeller and will simply refuse to disclose specifics.

Could it be there is an attempt by the Intelligence community to finally strike back at the snipers in their midst that have been hounding Bush with selective leaks throughout his Presidency?

One can only hope.

Cheers,

knews hound

Latest article"The Rope a Dope Gambit"

119 posted on 12/22/2005 1:20:15 PM PST by knews_hound (Now with two handed typing !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: July 4th

Did you use a conversion program to convert to exact text or what? Thanks.


142 posted on 12/22/2005 1:54:36 PM PST by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson