Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highball
Nonsense. ID is not a scientific theory.

Should we make an assumption in our schools that

(A)God exist?

(B)Does not exist?

(C)Is irrelevant?

235 posted on 12/22/2005 11:19:07 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7
Should we make an assumption in our schools that ...

Science cannot exist with assuming that God is irrelevant. Even Newton assumed that the laws of nature were established at creation and not subject to constant fiddling. One can believe in miracles, but cannot believe that constant intervention is necessary or likely. The assumption of science is that every phenomenon has an explanation that can be derived by assuming consistency.

240 posted on 12/22/2005 11:24:56 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
"Nonsense. ID is not a scientific theory."

Should we make an assumption in our schools that (A)God exist?

(B)Does not exist?

(C)Is irrelevant?

What does that have to do with ID failing to meet the basic standards for a scientific theory?

242 posted on 12/22/2005 11:28:03 AM PST by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson