Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Darancette
You posted:

Intelligent design has nothing to do with evolution or creationism.

I responded:

Not factually correct. Didn't you read the court transcript which showed the Panda book originally had "creation" in numerous places, but after the Supreme Court Edwards decision in 1987 a global search and replace was made to insert "intelligence"? ...

Now you respond:

What does a singular court decision based on one poorly crafted book have to do with deciding the fallacy of ID?

I demonstrated a connection between ID and creationism. I did not attempt to demonstrate a "fallacy" or any such.

I merely responded to your claim "Intelligent design has nothing to do with evolution or creationism" with evidence to the contrary.

210 posted on 12/22/2005 10:32:07 AM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
"Intelligent design has nothing to do with evolution or creationism"

. Let me change that statement then.

"Intelligent design no causal relationship with evolution or creationism".

214 posted on 12/22/2005 10:39:26 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson