Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oceanview
"because he knows he will lose this at the SCOTUS."

Exactly.

In all likelihood, the designation of enemy combatant being applied to a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil on weak evidence from questionable sources is very likely illegal. This is the question that would be before the SCOTUS. If the Administration thought they were on solid ground here, there would be no reason to back down.

The constitution has served us well, lets not abandon it so quickly.
78 posted on 12/21/2005 4:51:12 PM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: ndt

actually, this is exactly why Lincoln suspended Habeas during the civil war.


80 posted on 12/21/2005 4:53:28 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: ndt
very likely illegal.

Where to you get that?

128 posted on 12/21/2005 6:18:36 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson