Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ndt

al qaeda is a foreign military, and Padilla was a "member". he may not have been on a battle field in Afghanistan with them, but what difference does that make.


160 posted on 12/21/2005 7:03:55 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview
"al qaeda is a foreign military, and Padilla was a "member"."

In Taliban Johns case, he was on the field with the enemy. In Padilla case he was at the airport quite possibly menacingly munching peanuts.

Just to reiterate for everyone. I'm not saying he didn't do it. Only that we still need to follow the Constitution and rule of law.

Also, when did we start calling A.Q. a foreign military? That would require we treat them as POWs.
163 posted on 12/21/2005 7:12:49 PM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson