Darwin and Darwinites don't.
THAT's the thing, right there. Many of us of faith do perceive God in all things, including the use of evolution over time to accomplish what He works. Even creating Darwin.
The problem is that Darwinites don't, can't, won't. Thus, they force a limitation to the understanding and definition of what is "science" just as this judge has...his entire argument rests upon him saying that ID "isn't 'science'" while, what IS "science" is theory when and if it includes Darwin's theory of evolution.
It's all theory. Science is nothing more than postulations that a number of people agree upon as representing accuracy, and thus, "scientific fact" is "proven." There's a more complex process involved in that, and I realize I simplify here, but, in essence, nothing is ever proven as 'fact' until and unless there's acceptance of the results proving that which is postulized.
It's a case today of human limitations determined among those limiting 'science' to mere evolution that 'science' exclude other possibilities. Darwin cannot explain and doesn't account for how life came to be, and beyond that, how the Big Bang was created and begun in and of itself.
The judge, this ruling of late, seems very limited in intellect.
The way I see it, even if G_d is influencing and has influenced things along the way, He DID something. Something happened, even if He only knows the "science" behind it. There is a manipulation of space, matter, and time in some manner or another.
I think the challenge of existing in the universe is to figure out how G_d works. I'd personally like to know if this experiment is being tried elsewhere in the galaxy and the rest of the universe. What other cool stuff has G_d done out there? If we have "brothers" out there, I'd sure like to meet 'em.
What part of the ruling did you not understand?