Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas
You wrote:

It should be obvious that having church in a government building would be against a strict separation doctrine.

I write;

I thought we were talking about a room in a government building being used to hold a service, not converting the building into a permanent church and whose doctrine are you talking about?
215 posted on 01/14/2006 7:20:13 AM PST by FredFlash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: FredFlash

Man, you aren't very smart, are you.

The strict separation doctrine as believed by most people alive today.

The strict separation doctrine is not in accordance with what the founders wanted. They had no problem with government entanglement in religious matters.


216 posted on 01/14/2006 10:52:16 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson