[doctorhugo]

I find it most interesting that I read the entire artickle and did not see the term 'public health' even once mentioned. The fact and very real mathematical reality that if you get one person with a sexually transmitted disease in a free or group sex environment that person will wreak exponentially devastating havoc.

The liberal/libertarian view is conceived in irresponsibility by definition. Is it not ironic that those followeing that lifestyle, legal or not, will be the ones to scream the loudest for the "g-o-v-e-r-n-m-e-n-t" to take care of them when AIDS, syphilis, gonorrhea or some other sexually transmitted disease pays them a visit.

"Oh Canada....,Glorious and Free...."

[Dumb_Ox]

Public health can't be defended once one commits to abandoning any conception of public morality. The former's dependent upon the latter.